Jump to content

Plea Agreements and Trial Procedures: Difference between revisions

From Prisonpedia
m Remove internal markers (HTML comments / script blocks)
Maintenance: add DEFAULTSORT so the page files under surname
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Plea agreements''' and '''trial procedures''' constitute the two primary paths for resolving criminal cases in the United States federal and state systems. A plea agreement is a binding contract between the prosecutor and defendant in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty (or nolo contendere) to one or more charges, usually in exchange for concessions such as charge reductions, dismissal of other counts, or a favorable sentencing recommendation. Trial procedures govern the adversarial process when a defendant pleads not guilty and the case proceeds to adjudication before a judge or jury.
In the federal criminal system, most cases never reach a jury. A defendant who is charged with a federal crime has two basic ways the case can end. He can plead guilty, often under a written agreement with the prosecutor, or he can take the case to trial. A plea agreement is a deal. The defendant gives up his right to a trial and admits guilt. In return the government gives up something, such as dropping other counts or recommending a lower sentence. The rules for how a judge accepts a guilty plea, and what the judge has to tell the defendant first, are set out in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.<ref name="rule11">{{cite web |title=Rule 11. Pleas |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11 |publisher=Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School |access-date=2026-06-03}}</ref>


As of fiscal year 2024, more than 97 percent of federal convictions and 94–96 percent of state convictions result from guilty pleas rather than trial verdicts.<ref>{{cite web |title=Statistical Tables FY 2024 |url=https://www.ussc.gov/research/statistical-tables/fy-2024 |publisher=U.S. Sentencing Commission |date=October 2025 |access-date=November 28, 2025}}</ref> The dominance of plea bargaining reflects prosecutorial leverage from mandatory minimums, sentencing guidelines, and trial penalties, while trials remain rare but constitutionally protected. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 governs plea proceedings, and Rules 23–31 govern trials.
Guilty pleas account for the large majority of federal cases. In fiscal year 2022, about 89.5 percent of all defendants in federal criminal cases pleaded guilty. Roughly 2.3 percent went to trial. The rest had their cases dismissed.<ref name="pew">{{cite web |last=Gramlich |first=John |title=Fewer than 1% of defendants in federal criminal cases were acquitted in 2022 |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/06/14/fewer-than-1-of-defendants-in-federal-criminal-cases-were-acquitted-in-2022/ |publisher=Pew Research Center |date=2023-06-14 |access-date=2026-06-03}}</ref> Of the defendants who were actually convicted, more than 97 percent were convicted by guilty plea rather than by a trial verdict.<ref name="ussc">{{cite web |title=Statistical Information Packet, Fiscal Year 2022 |url=https://www.ussc.gov/research/sourcebook-2022 |publisher=U.S. Sentencing Commission |date=2023 |access-date=2026-06-03}}</ref> The trial, which is the part of the system people picture from television, is the rare outcome.


Plea agreements and trial procedures matter because they determine how nearly every criminal case ends, affecting sentence length, collateral consequences, and appellate rights. A guilty plea waives most pretrial challenges and the right to trial, whereas proceeding to trial preserves those rights but exposes defendants to potentially harsher sentences if convicted.
This page explains how federal plea agreements work, the three kinds Rule 11 allows, what a judge says to a defendant during the plea hearing, and what happens in the small share of cases that go all the way to a jury.


==How Plea Agreements Work==
== Overview ==


Plea agreements are negotiated between the prosecutor and defense counsel, then presented to the court for approval. The three main federal types are:
A plea agreement is a contract between the defendant and the United States. The two sides negotiate it. Defense counsel and the prosecutor work out terms, put them in writing, and present the result to the judge. The judge is not a party to the negotiation. The judge decides whether to accept the deal.<ref name="rule11"/>


- '''Charge bargaining''' – defendant pleads to fewer or lesser charges.
The reason most defendants plead guilty comes down to math and risk. Federal sentencing is driven by the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which assign an offense level and a criminal history category that together produce a recommended sentencing range. A defendant who pleads guilty and accepts responsibility for the offense usually qualifies for a reduction in his offense level under the Guidelines, which lowers the range.<ref name="guidelines">{{cite web |title=2023 Guidelines Manual, §3E1.1 (Acceptance of Responsibility) |url=https://www.ussc.gov/guidelines/2023-guidelines-manual |publisher=U.S. Sentencing Commission |date=2023 |access-date=2026-06-03}}</ref> A defendant who goes to trial and loses generally does not get that reduction. He also faces the full weight of whatever the jury convicts him on. The gap between the plea sentence and the post-trial sentence is large in many cases, and that gap shapes the decision.


- '''Sentence bargaining''' – prosecutor recommends a specific sentence or range (often with a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) binding agreement).
A guilty plea also closes doors. By pleading guilty the defendant gives up the right to a trial and most challenges he could have raised in one. Many federal plea agreements include an appeal waiver, in which the defendant agrees not to appeal his conviction or sentence except in narrow circumstances. Going to trial keeps those rights open but carries the risk of a worse result.


- '''Fact bargaining''' – parties stipulate to facts that limit guideline calculations or avoid certain enhancements.
== Types of Plea Agreements (Rule 11) ==


The written agreement details charges, concessions, cooperation obligations (if any), and appellate waivers. The judge conducts a Rule 11 colloquy to ensure the plea is voluntary, intelligent, and factually supported. The court may accept, reject, or defer decision on the plea until reviewing the presentence report.
Rule 11(c)(1) describes three forms a plea agreement can take. They differ in what the prosecutor promises and in how much power the judge keeps over the sentence.<ref name="rule11"/>


==Types of Plea Agreements==
=== Rule 11(c)(1)(A): Charge bargain ===


- '''Open plea''' – guilty plea with no agreement; defendant hopes for leniency.
In an (A) agreement the government agrees not to bring certain charges, or to move to dismiss charges that have already been filed. The defendant pleads guilty to fewer counts, or to a lesser count, and the rest go away. This is a charge bargain. It matters because the charges a defendant is convicted of set the ceiling on his possible sentence and feed directly into the Guidelines calculation. Dropping a count with a mandatory minimum, for example, can change the outcome more than any sentencing argument later.<ref name="rule11"/>


- '''Cooperation agreement (5K1.1 / § 3553(e))''' – defendant provides substantial assistance; prosecutor files motion for downward departure.
=== Rule 11(c)(1)(B): Non-binding recommendation ===


- '''Non-prosecution or deferred-prosecution agreement (DPA/NPA)''' – for corporations or rare individuals; charges held in abeyance or never filed upon compliance.
In a (B) agreement the government agrees to recommend a particular sentence, or to not oppose the defendant's request for one. The key word is recommend. The recommendation does not bind the judge. The judge can listen to it and then impose a different sentence, higher or lower. A defendant who pleads under a (B) agreement is not allowed to withdraw his plea just because the judge rejects the recommendation and gives him more time.<ref name="rule11"/> This is the most common structure, and it leaves the real sentencing decision with the court.


- '''Alford plea''' – defendant maintains innocence but pleads guilty to avoid worse outcome (accepted in most states, some federal circuits).
=== Rule 11(c)(1)(C): Binding sentence ===


'''Trial Procedures'''
In a (C) agreement the two sides agree that a specific sentence, or a specific sentencing range, is the right disposition. This kind of agreement binds the judge, but only once the judge accepts it. The judge has a choice. He can accept the agreement, in which case he must impose the agreed sentence. He can reject it, in which case the defendant is allowed to withdraw his guilty plea and the case can go forward as if no deal had been made.<ref name="rule11"/> Lawyers often call these "C pleas." They give the defendant the most certainty about his sentence, which is why they are common in cases where the exact number matters most to the parties.


When a defendant pleads not guilty, the case proceeds to trial:
== The Plea Colloquy ==


1. '''Jury Selection''' – venire summoned; voir dire conducted; peremptory and for-cause challenges used.
Before a judge can accept a guilty plea, the judge has to talk to the defendant directly, on the record, in open court. This conversation is called the plea colloquy. Its purpose is to confirm that the plea is knowing and voluntary and that there is a real factual basis for it. Rule 11(b) lays out what the judge must cover.<ref name="rule11"/>


2. '''Opening Statements''' – prosecution first, then defense (or reserved).
The judge places the defendant under oath and addresses him personally. The judge then makes sure the defendant understands several things. He must understand the nature of each charge he is pleading to. He must understand the maximum possible penalty, including any mandatory minimum sentence, any term of supervised release, and any fine or restitution. The judge confirms the defendant understands he is doing this voluntarily and that no one has threatened him or made promises outside the written agreement to get him to plead.<ref name="rule11"/>


3. '''Government Case-in-Chief''' – prosecution presents witnesses and evidence; defense cross-examines.
The heart of the colloquy is the list of rights the defendant gives up. Under Rule 11(b)(1) the judge tells the defendant that by pleading guilty he is waiving:


4. '''Defense Case''' – defendant may present witnesses or rest without evidence (no adverse inference federally).
* the right to plead not guilty, or to keep a not-guilty plea already entered;
* the right to a jury trial;
* the right to be represented by counsel at that trial;
* the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him;
* the right against self-incrimination, meaning he cannot be forced to testify against himself; and
* the right to testify, to present evidence, and to compel witnesses to appear in his defense.<ref name="rule11"/>


5. '''Rebuttal and Surrebuttal''' – limited additional evidence.
The judge also establishes a factual basis for the plea, usually by having the prosecutor state what the government would prove or by asking the defendant to describe what he did. A guilty plea is not accepted on the admission alone. There has to be a factual basis on the record showing the conduct actually amounts to the crime.<ref name="rule11"/>


6. '''Closing Arguments''' – prosecution, defense, prosecution rebuttal.
If the defendant answers the questions, says he understands the rights he is giving up, and admits the conduct, the judge can accept the plea. In some cases the judge defers the decision until after reviewing the presentence report, which is prepared by the probation office and calculates the Guidelines range.


7. '''Jury Instructions''' – judge explains law.
== Trial Procedures ==


8. '''Deliberation and Verdict''' – unanimous verdict required federally and in all states post-''Ramos v. Louisiana'' (2020).
When a defendant pleads not guilty, the case is set for trial. A federal criminal trial follows a defined sequence, and the burden stays on the government the entire time.<ref name="rule23">{{cite web |title=Rule 23. Jury or Nonjury Trial |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_23 |publisher=Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School |access-date=2026-06-03}}</ref>


Bench trials follow the same sequence but without a jury.
Most felony defendants are tried before a jury. A defendant can waive the jury and be tried by the judge alone, which is called a bench trial, but that requires the government's consent and the court's approval.<ref name="rule23"/> Trial begins with jury selection. A pool of prospective jurors is summoned, and the lawyers and judge question them in a process called voir dire. Each side can remove a limited number of jurors without giving a reason, using what are called peremptory challenges, and an unlimited number for cause when a juror cannot be fair.


==Key Processes and Procedures==
After the jury is seated, the lawyers give opening statements. The prosecution goes first. Then the government puts on its case. It calls witnesses and introduces evidence, and the defense gets to cross-examine each witness. The government carries the burden of proof, and the standard is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant is presumed innocent and does not have to prove anything.<ref name="due">{{cite web |title=In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970) |url=https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/397/358/ |publisher=Justia |date=1970 |access-date=2026-06-03}}</ref>


===Plea Colloquy (Rule 11)===
When the government rests, the defense may present its own witnesses and evidence, or it may rest without putting on anything at all. The defendant has a right not to testify, and the jury is told it cannot hold his silence against him. After the evidence is in, both sides give closing arguments. The prosecution argues first and, because it carries the burden, usually gets a final rebuttal after the defense closes.
Judge must confirm:
- Defendant understands charges and maximum penalties
- Plea is voluntary (no coercion)
- Factual basis exists
- Rights waived (trial, confrontation, self-incrimination)


===Trial Timeline (Federal)===
The judge then instructs the jury on the law that applies, explaining the elements of each charge and the reasonable-doubt standard. The jury goes out to deliberate in private. In federal criminal cases the verdict must be unanimous. All twelve jurors have to agree to convict or to acquit.<ref name="rule31">{{cite web |title=Rule 31. Jury Verdict |url=https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_31 |publisher=Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School |access-date=2026-06-03}}</ref> If the jury cannot reach agreement, the result is a hung jury and a mistrial, and the government can choose to try the case again. A defendant who is acquitted goes free and cannot be tried again for the same offense. A defendant who is convicted moves on to sentencing, which the judge sets for a later date.
Speedy Trial Act requires trial within 70 days of indictment or initial appearance (excludable delays common). Average time to trial: 12–18 months.


===Sentencing After Plea vs. Trial===
== Frequently Asked Questions ==
Defendants who plead guilty typically receive 2–3 level reduction for acceptance of responsibility (§3E1.1). Trial conviction often loses this credit, adding 1–10+ years depending on offense level.


==Current Practices (2025)==
'''What is a federal plea agreement?'''


Federal plea rate remains 97.5 percent; cooperation agreements filed in 18 percent of drug cases. Several districts (SDNY, EDVA) require written plea policies for transparency.<ref>{{cite web |title=Justice Manual § 9-27.000 - Principles of Federal Prosecution |url=https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-27000-principles-federal-prosecution |publisher=U.S. Department of Justice |date=January 2025 |access-date=November 28, 2025}}</ref>
It is a written contract between a defendant and the government. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to one or more charges, and in exchange the prosecutor agrees to something, such as dismissing other counts or recommending a particular sentence. A judge has to accept the agreement and the guilty plea before it takes effect.


==How Defendants Choose Between Plea and Trial==
'''What is the difference between a (B) plea and a (C) plea?'''


Defense counsel advises based on evidence strength, sentencing exposure, and client goals. Plea agreements must be disclosed; ineffective assistance claims often arise from alleged coercion or bad advice.
In a Rule 11(c)(1)(B) agreement, the prosecutor recommends a sentence but the judge does not have to follow it, and the defendant cannot take back his plea if the judge gives him more time. In a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) agreement, the parties agree on a specific sentence that binds the judge once the judge accepts the deal. If the judge rejects a (C) agreement, the defendant can withdraw his plea.


==Research Findings and Statistics==
'''What rights do you give up by pleading guilty?'''


Defendants who go to trial receive sentences 3–8 times longer on average (the "trial penalty").<ref>{{cite web |title=The Trial Penalty: A Vanishing Option |url=https://www.nacdl.org/Document/TrialPenaltySixthAmendmentRighttoTrialNearExtinct |publisher=National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers |date=May 2024 |access-date=November 28, 2025}}</ref> Plea accuracy studies estimate 2–8 percent of guilty pleas are factually innocent.
A guilty plea waives the right to a jury trial, the right to make the government prove its case, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to present a defense. The judge reviews each of these with the defendant during the plea colloquy.


==Criticisms and Challenges==
'''What is a plea colloquy?'''


Critics argue plea bargaining coerces innocent defendants, undermines the presumption of innocence, and creates sentencing disparities. Trial penalty discourages exercise of Sixth Amendment rights. Reform proposals include plea guidelines, mandatory discovery before pleas, and limits on appellate waivers.
It is the in-court conversation between the judge and the defendant before a guilty plea is accepted. The judge confirms the defendant understands the charges, the maximum penalties, and the rights he is waiving, and that the plea is voluntary. The judge also confirms there is a factual basis for the plea.


==Historical Background==
'''Do most federal cases go to trial?'''


Plea bargaining emerged in the late 19th century amid rising caseloads; by 1920s it dominated. Trial remained common until mandatory minimums and Guidelines (1980s–1990s) dramatically increased plea leverage.
No. The large majority of federal cases end in guilty pleas. In fiscal year 2022, about 89.5 percent of all federal defendants pleaded guilty and only about 2.3 percent went to trial. Among defendants who were convicted, more than 97 percent were convicted by plea.


===Legislative and Judicial Developments===
'''What does the government have to prove at trial?'''


- ''Santobello v. New York'' (1971) – plea agreements enforceable as contracts
The government must prove every element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant is presumed innocent and is not required to prove anything or to testify.
- ''Bordenkircher v. Hayes'' (1978) – prosecutorial threat of harsher charges permissible
- ''Missouri v. Frye'' & ''Lafler v. Cooper'' (2012) – ineffective assistance applies to plea stage
- First Step Act (2018) – expanded safety valve, reducing plea coercion in some drug cases


==See also==
'''Does a federal jury have to be unanimous?'''
* [[Plea Bargaining in the United States]]
* [[Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure]]
* [[Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution]]
* [[United States v. Booker]]


==External links==
Yes. A guilty or not-guilty verdict in a federal criminal case must be unanimous. If the jurors cannot all agree, the result is a hung jury and a mistrial, and the government may decide whether to retry the case.
* [https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-27000-principles-federal-prosecution Justice Manual – Principles of Federal Prosecution]
 
* [https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_11 Rule 11. Pleas]
== References ==


==References==
<references />
<references />


<html>
{{DEFAULTSORT:Procedures, Plea Agreements and Trial}}
 
[[Category:Federal Criminal Law]]
</html>


{{#seo:
{{#seo:
|title=Federal Plea Agreements and Trial Procedures
|title_mode=append
|title_mode=append
|title_separator= - Prisonpedia
|title_separator= - Prisonpedia
|description=Guide to federal plea agreements and trial procedures. Learn about plea bargaining, trial rights, and court processes.
|description=How federal plea agreements work under Rule 11, the three plea-agreement types, the plea colloquy and rights waived, and what happens when a federal case goes to trial.
|keywords=plea agreement, guilty plea, trial, federal court, plea bargain
|keywords=plea agreement, Rule 11, plea colloquy, federal trial, guilty plea, charge bargain, binding plea, jury verdict
|type=article
|type=Article
|site_name=Prisonpedia
|site_name=Prisonpedia
|locale=en_US
|locale=en_US
|modified_time=2026-06-03
}}
}}
{{MetaDescription|Learn about Plea Agreements and Trial Procedures's federal case, conviction, and prison experience on Prisonpedia.}}
{{MetaDescription|How federal plea agreements work under Rule 11, the three plea types, the plea colloquy, and what happens when a federal case goes to trial.}}
 
== Nightmare Success Guides ==
* [https://nightmaresuccess.com/guides/how-federal-sentencing-works-step-by-step/ How Federal Sentencing Actually Works] — Practical breakdown from investigation through sentencing, grounded in real guest stories.

Latest revision as of 13:55, 3 June 2026

In the federal criminal system, most cases never reach a jury. A defendant who is charged with a federal crime has two basic ways the case can end. He can plead guilty, often under a written agreement with the prosecutor, or he can take the case to trial. A plea agreement is a deal. The defendant gives up his right to a trial and admits guilt. In return the government gives up something, such as dropping other counts or recommending a lower sentence. The rules for how a judge accepts a guilty plea, and what the judge has to tell the defendant first, are set out in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.[1]

Guilty pleas account for the large majority of federal cases. In fiscal year 2022, about 89.5 percent of all defendants in federal criminal cases pleaded guilty. Roughly 2.3 percent went to trial. The rest had their cases dismissed.[2] Of the defendants who were actually convicted, more than 97 percent were convicted by guilty plea rather than by a trial verdict.[3] The trial, which is the part of the system people picture from television, is the rare outcome.

This page explains how federal plea agreements work, the three kinds Rule 11 allows, what a judge says to a defendant during the plea hearing, and what happens in the small share of cases that go all the way to a jury.

Overview

A plea agreement is a contract between the defendant and the United States. The two sides negotiate it. Defense counsel and the prosecutor work out terms, put them in writing, and present the result to the judge. The judge is not a party to the negotiation. The judge decides whether to accept the deal.[1]

The reason most defendants plead guilty comes down to math and risk. Federal sentencing is driven by the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which assign an offense level and a criminal history category that together produce a recommended sentencing range. A defendant who pleads guilty and accepts responsibility for the offense usually qualifies for a reduction in his offense level under the Guidelines, which lowers the range.[4] A defendant who goes to trial and loses generally does not get that reduction. He also faces the full weight of whatever the jury convicts him on. The gap between the plea sentence and the post-trial sentence is large in many cases, and that gap shapes the decision.

A guilty plea also closes doors. By pleading guilty the defendant gives up the right to a trial and most challenges he could have raised in one. Many federal plea agreements include an appeal waiver, in which the defendant agrees not to appeal his conviction or sentence except in narrow circumstances. Going to trial keeps those rights open but carries the risk of a worse result.

Types of Plea Agreements (Rule 11)

Rule 11(c)(1) describes three forms a plea agreement can take. They differ in what the prosecutor promises and in how much power the judge keeps over the sentence.[1]

Rule 11(c)(1)(A): Charge bargain

In an (A) agreement the government agrees not to bring certain charges, or to move to dismiss charges that have already been filed. The defendant pleads guilty to fewer counts, or to a lesser count, and the rest go away. This is a charge bargain. It matters because the charges a defendant is convicted of set the ceiling on his possible sentence and feed directly into the Guidelines calculation. Dropping a count with a mandatory minimum, for example, can change the outcome more than any sentencing argument later.[1]

Rule 11(c)(1)(B): Non-binding recommendation

In a (B) agreement the government agrees to recommend a particular sentence, or to not oppose the defendant's request for one. The key word is recommend. The recommendation does not bind the judge. The judge can listen to it and then impose a different sentence, higher or lower. A defendant who pleads under a (B) agreement is not allowed to withdraw his plea just because the judge rejects the recommendation and gives him more time.[1] This is the most common structure, and it leaves the real sentencing decision with the court.

Rule 11(c)(1)(C): Binding sentence

In a (C) agreement the two sides agree that a specific sentence, or a specific sentencing range, is the right disposition. This kind of agreement binds the judge, but only once the judge accepts it. The judge has a choice. He can accept the agreement, in which case he must impose the agreed sentence. He can reject it, in which case the defendant is allowed to withdraw his guilty plea and the case can go forward as if no deal had been made.[1] Lawyers often call these "C pleas." They give the defendant the most certainty about his sentence, which is why they are common in cases where the exact number matters most to the parties.

The Plea Colloquy

Before a judge can accept a guilty plea, the judge has to talk to the defendant directly, on the record, in open court. This conversation is called the plea colloquy. Its purpose is to confirm that the plea is knowing and voluntary and that there is a real factual basis for it. Rule 11(b) lays out what the judge must cover.[1]

The judge places the defendant under oath and addresses him personally. The judge then makes sure the defendant understands several things. He must understand the nature of each charge he is pleading to. He must understand the maximum possible penalty, including any mandatory minimum sentence, any term of supervised release, and any fine or restitution. The judge confirms the defendant understands he is doing this voluntarily and that no one has threatened him or made promises outside the written agreement to get him to plead.[1]

The heart of the colloquy is the list of rights the defendant gives up. Under Rule 11(b)(1) the judge tells the defendant that by pleading guilty he is waiving:

  • the right to plead not guilty, or to keep a not-guilty plea already entered;
  • the right to a jury trial;
  • the right to be represented by counsel at that trial;
  • the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him;
  • the right against self-incrimination, meaning he cannot be forced to testify against himself; and
  • the right to testify, to present evidence, and to compel witnesses to appear in his defense.[1]

The judge also establishes a factual basis for the plea, usually by having the prosecutor state what the government would prove or by asking the defendant to describe what he did. A guilty plea is not accepted on the admission alone. There has to be a factual basis on the record showing the conduct actually amounts to the crime.[1]

If the defendant answers the questions, says he understands the rights he is giving up, and admits the conduct, the judge can accept the plea. In some cases the judge defers the decision until after reviewing the presentence report, which is prepared by the probation office and calculates the Guidelines range.

Trial Procedures

When a defendant pleads not guilty, the case is set for trial. A federal criminal trial follows a defined sequence, and the burden stays on the government the entire time.[5]

Most felony defendants are tried before a jury. A defendant can waive the jury and be tried by the judge alone, which is called a bench trial, but that requires the government's consent and the court's approval.[5] Trial begins with jury selection. A pool of prospective jurors is summoned, and the lawyers and judge question them in a process called voir dire. Each side can remove a limited number of jurors without giving a reason, using what are called peremptory challenges, and an unlimited number for cause when a juror cannot be fair.

After the jury is seated, the lawyers give opening statements. The prosecution goes first. Then the government puts on its case. It calls witnesses and introduces evidence, and the defense gets to cross-examine each witness. The government carries the burden of proof, and the standard is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant is presumed innocent and does not have to prove anything.[6]

When the government rests, the defense may present its own witnesses and evidence, or it may rest without putting on anything at all. The defendant has a right not to testify, and the jury is told it cannot hold his silence against him. After the evidence is in, both sides give closing arguments. The prosecution argues first and, because it carries the burden, usually gets a final rebuttal after the defense closes.

The judge then instructs the jury on the law that applies, explaining the elements of each charge and the reasonable-doubt standard. The jury goes out to deliberate in private. In federal criminal cases the verdict must be unanimous. All twelve jurors have to agree to convict or to acquit.[7] If the jury cannot reach agreement, the result is a hung jury and a mistrial, and the government can choose to try the case again. A defendant who is acquitted goes free and cannot be tried again for the same offense. A defendant who is convicted moves on to sentencing, which the judge sets for a later date.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a federal plea agreement?

It is a written contract between a defendant and the government. The defendant agrees to plead guilty to one or more charges, and in exchange the prosecutor agrees to something, such as dismissing other counts or recommending a particular sentence. A judge has to accept the agreement and the guilty plea before it takes effect.

What is the difference between a (B) plea and a (C) plea?

In a Rule 11(c)(1)(B) agreement, the prosecutor recommends a sentence but the judge does not have to follow it, and the defendant cannot take back his plea if the judge gives him more time. In a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) agreement, the parties agree on a specific sentence that binds the judge once the judge accepts the deal. If the judge rejects a (C) agreement, the defendant can withdraw his plea.

What rights do you give up by pleading guilty?

A guilty plea waives the right to a jury trial, the right to make the government prove its case, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to present a defense. The judge reviews each of these with the defendant during the plea colloquy.

What is a plea colloquy?

It is the in-court conversation between the judge and the defendant before a guilty plea is accepted. The judge confirms the defendant understands the charges, the maximum penalties, and the rights he is waiving, and that the plea is voluntary. The judge also confirms there is a factual basis for the plea.

Do most federal cases go to trial?

No. The large majority of federal cases end in guilty pleas. In fiscal year 2022, about 89.5 percent of all federal defendants pleaded guilty and only about 2.3 percent went to trial. Among defendants who were convicted, more than 97 percent were convicted by plea.

What does the government have to prove at trial?

The government must prove every element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant is presumed innocent and is not required to prove anything or to testify.

Does a federal jury have to be unanimous?

Yes. A guilty or not-guilty verdict in a federal criminal case must be unanimous. If the jurors cannot all agree, the result is a hung jury and a mistrial, and the government may decide whether to retry the case.

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 "Rule 11. Pleas". Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. Retrieved 2026-06-03.
  2. "Fewer than 1% of defendants in federal criminal cases were acquitted in 2022". Pew Research Center. Retrieved 2026-06-03.
  3. "Statistical Information Packet, Fiscal Year 2022". U.S. Sentencing Commission. Retrieved 2026-06-03.
  4. "2023 Guidelines Manual, §3E1.1 (Acceptance of Responsibility)". U.S. Sentencing Commission. Retrieved 2026-06-03.
  5. 5.0 5.1 "Rule 23. Jury or Nonjury Trial". Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. Retrieved 2026-06-03.
  6. "In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970)". Justia. Retrieved 2026-06-03.
  7. "Rule 31. Jury Verdict". Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School. Retrieved 2026-06-03.